MarketPR
The argument that Kevin Warsh could prove a sound Federal Reserve chair is conditional rather than settled.
He must stay clear on the objectives of monetary policy and remain sensible about how the central bank should conduct itself. Two requirements, plainly stated, and they are doing more work than they appear to.
The "might yet" framing is deliberate. It positions the debate around Warsh as genuinely open, not as a vehicle for a conclusion already reached.
The case for him is not built on a record that resolves the question but on what he would need to do in the role. That distinction matters to anyone trying to calibrate the setup from the outside.
Keep reading