MarketPR
The New Yorker drew criticism Thursday after promoting an essay that described the binary distinction between being pregnant and not pregnant as "misleading," suggesting a woman could be "kind of pregnant, a little bit pregnant, or almost pregnant, or maybe pregnant" while still testing positive.
The essay, "The Unsettling Ambiguity of Early Pregnancy" by Apoorva Tadepalli, examined what early at-home testing can and cannot tell a woman about a pregnancy's outcome, drawing on Tadepalli's account of positive tests across five pregnancies and repeated uncertainty about viability.
The magazine promoted the piece on X with language that critics said conflated the existence of a pregnancy with its prognosis.
Roxanne Hoge, chair of the Los Angeles County Republican Party and a mother of four, told Fox News Digital that uncertainty over viability does not change whether a woman is pregnant.
Keep reading