POOLPool Corporation confirms 2026 earnings guidance after Q3 sales riseOct 22DEALSAutodesk sales growth lags software sector standardsOct 22CRYPTOBill Gates warns of two decades of turbulent AI disruptionOct 22DEALSGap Inc store closures and low returns deter investors despite low valuationOct 22ENERGYUS Patriot scarcity complicates Ukraine ceasefire pushOct 22AESIAtlas Energy Solutions closes $424 million bridge facility for data centersOct 22UNPUnion Pacific Q3 EPS rises 16% to $3.49 on volume growthOct 22RIVNRivian R2 Launch Targets Positive Gross Profit by Year-EndOct 22DEALSDavid's Bridal to spin off AI unit Pearl at $350 million valuationOct 22VREXVarex Imaging files 8-K amid Teledyne merger litigationOct 22POOLPool Corporation confirms 2026 earnings guidance after Q3 sales riseOct 22DEALSAutodesk sales growth lags software sector standardsOct 22CRYPTOBill Gates warns of two decades of turbulent AI disruptionOct 22DEALSGap Inc store closures and low returns deter investors despite low valuationOct 22ENERGYUS Patriot scarcity complicates Ukraine ceasefire pushOct 22AESIAtlas Energy Solutions closes $424 million bridge facility for data centersOct 22UNPUnion Pacific Q3 EPS rises 16% to $3.49 on volume growthOct 22RIVNRivian R2 Launch Targets Positive Gross Profit by Year-EndOct 22DEALSDavid's Bridal to spin off AI unit Pearl at $350 million valuationOct 22VREXVarex Imaging files 8-K amid Teledyne merger litigationOct 22

Ackman and Tepper raised Meta Platforms stakes in Q2, with costs now the central question for the tape

Form 13F filings for the second quarter reveal that Bill Ackman's Pershing Square raised its Meta Platforms (Nasdaq: META) position by 20%, bringing the holding to nearly 10% of the fund, while David Tepper's Appaloosa Management grew its Meta stake by more than 50%, to a 5% portfolio weight. The filings reflect positions as of June 30. The stock has declined roughly 3% since that date and is down around 6% from April 1.

By Renata OstrowskiNewsroomSeptember 8, 20262 min readMETA
Share

Key takeaways

  • Q2 13F filings show Bill Ackman's Pershing Square raised its Meta Platforms stake by 20%, bringing it to nearly 10% of the fund, while David Tepper's Appaloosa grew its Meta stake by more than 50%, to a 5% portfolio weight.
  • Meta's Q2 results showed 28% revenue growth but a 55% rise in operating expenses, squeezing margins and triggering a sell-off after earnings.
  • The expense surge stems from Meta's AI computing infrastructure build-out, for which CEO Mark Zuckerberg released a document that stopped short of a concrete monetization timeline.
  • Meta trades at 17.5 times forward earnings, well below the S&P 500's 21.4 times forward multiple, reflecting consensus doubt about near-term AI monetization.
  • Since June 30, Meta stock has declined roughly 3%, and it is down about 6% from April 1.

Form 13F filings for the second quarter reveal that Bill Ackman's Pershing Square raised its Meta Platforms (Nasdaq: META) position by 20%, bringing the holding to nearly 10% of the fund, while David Tepper's Appaloosa Management grew its Meta stake by more than 50%, to a 5% portfolio weight. The filings reflect positions as of June 30. The stock has declined roughly 3% since that date and is down around 6% from April 1.

The cost structure the market is pricing

Second quarter results delivered 28% revenue growth, but operating expenses climbed 55%, squeezing operating margins and prompting a sell-off after the earnings print. The cost expansion traces to Meta's AI computing infrastructure build-out, a program large enough that CEO Mark Zuckerberg released an extended document on the company's AI plans after investor questions intensified. The document stopped short of a concrete monetization timeline. At 17.5 times forward earnings, Meta sits well below the S&P 500's 21.4 times forward multiple. The gap reflects how thoroughly consensus has discounted the company's ability to convert AI spending into revenue on a near-term schedule.

Ackman and Tepper are presumably underwriting the other side of that bet. Both are described as value investors who buy perceived dislocations. Their Q2 accumulation suggests they view the cost surge as a temporary build, and the current multiple as mispriced relative to eventual earnings capacity. That said, the 13F is a lagging instrument: positions are disclosed after a delay, and each manager's actual entry price during Q2 remains undisclosed, so the filing records what they held at quarter-end, not what they paid on any particular session.

What to watch for the setup

Meta's revenue grew 28% in Q2. The tension sits entirely in the 55% expense expansion and the absence of a defined monetization roadmap for the AI infrastructure. Those two factors are what hold the forward multiple below the broader market. Any filing, guidance update, or management communication that draws a firmer boundary around capital expenditure would shift the setup. The tape is pricing the spending curve.

Related reading

About this story

Filed by the newsroom of MarketPR on September 8, 2026. Source: finance.yahoo.com. Indicative figures are not investment advice.

←Back to the news index

Frequently asked

How much did Ackman and Tepper increase their Meta stakes?

Pershing Square raised its Meta position by 20% to nearly 10% of the fund, and Appaloosa grew its Meta stake by more than 50% to a 5% portfolio weight, as of June 30.

Why did Meta's stock sell off after Q2 earnings?

Operating expenses climbed 55% against 28% revenue growth, squeezing operating margins and prompting a sell-off after the earnings print.

What is driving Meta's cost increase?

The cost expansion traces to Meta's AI computing infrastructure build-out, a program large enough that CEO Mark Zuckerberg released an extended document on the company's AI plans.

What are investors watching next for Meta?

They are watching for any filing, guidance update, or management communication that draws a firmer boundary around capital expenditure, since the tape is pricing the spending curve.

Do the 13F filings show what Ackman and Tepper paid for their shares?

No; the 13F is a lagging instrument that records quarter-end holdings, and each manager's actual entry price during Q2 remains undisclosed.