GEGE Aerospace raises 2026 guidance on record engine ordersOct 21INSMInsmed adds Sanofi and Verily executives to boardOct 21MAMastercard Q2 Revenue Beats Gross Dollar Volume GrowthOct 21REGULATORYKiffin blames SEC schedule for LSU strugglesOct 21EARNINGSNextDC shares plunge 39.5% after slashing earnings forecastOct 21NLYAnnaly Capital Management reports $0.80 EAD per share for third quarterOct 21SHFSNasdaq grants Safe Harbor Financial extra 180 days to meet bid priceOct 21INDPIndaptus Therapeutics completes $24 million private placementOct 21JEFJefferies discloses recent share repurchases at investor meetingOct 20LNZALanzaTech Global Files 8-K for LanzaJet Recapitalization and $10M Note IssuanceOct 20GEGE Aerospace raises 2026 guidance on record engine ordersOct 21INSMInsmed adds Sanofi and Verily executives to boardOct 21MAMastercard Q2 Revenue Beats Gross Dollar Volume GrowthOct 21REGULATORYKiffin blames SEC schedule for LSU strugglesOct 21EARNINGSNextDC shares plunge 39.5% after slashing earnings forecastOct 21NLYAnnaly Capital Management reports $0.80 EAD per share for third quarterOct 21SHFSNasdaq grants Safe Harbor Financial extra 180 days to meet bid priceOct 21INDPIndaptus Therapeutics completes $24 million private placementOct 21JEFJefferies discloses recent share repurchases at investor meetingOct 20LNZALanzaTech Global Files 8-K for LanzaJet Recapitalization and $10M Note IssuanceOct 20

Crypto Lobby Pushes Congress to Pass Staking and Mining Tax Bill Without Changes

A coalition of three cryptocurrency lobbying organizations is calling on Congress to advance a bill that would defer taxation of staking and mining rewards until the point of sale, urging lawmakers to pass the legislation without further amendments. The groups argue the measure, as written, provides the regulatory clarity the industry needs and should not be reopened for revision.

By Renata OstrowskiDigital Assets DeskJune 23, 20262 min read
Share

Key takeaways

  • A coalition of three cryptocurrency lobbying organizations is urging Congress to pass a bill, without further amendments, that would defer taxation of staking and mining rewards until the assets are sold.
  • Under the proposed legislation, miners and stakers would not owe tax when they receive newly issued tokens as rewards, with the taxable event triggering only upon eventual sale.
  • The bill contrasts with a potential interpretation of existing law that could treat receipt of rewards as ordinary income immediately, which has created legal uncertainty in the industry.
  • The lobby groups oppose amendments because each amendment cycle risks narrowing the bill's scope, adding reporting requirements, or attaching unrelated provisions that complicate passage.
  • The groups did not publicly identify specific amendments they fear or name individual lawmakers whose positions prompted their statement.

A coalition of three cryptocurrency lobbying organizations is calling on Congress to advance a bill that would defer taxation of staking and mining rewards until the point of sale, urging lawmakers to pass the legislation without further amendments. The groups argue the measure, as written, provides the regulatory clarity the industry needs and should not be reopened for revision.

What the Bill Would Do

Under the proposed legislation, miners and stakers would not owe tax when they receive newly issued tokens as rewards — the taxable event would trigger only when those assets are eventually sold. That structure contrasts with a potential interpretation of existing law that could treat receipt of rewards as ordinary income immediately, a position that has generated legal uncertainty across the industry.

The distinction matters operationally: participants who earn rewards but hold illiquid positions or lack fiat liquidity at the time of receipt would avoid a tax liability before they have converted any asset to cash.

Why the Lobby Groups Are Drawing a Line on Amendments

The three organizations' joint position — pass it as written — reflects a calculated risk assessment. Each amendment cycle introduces the possibility of language that could narrow the bill's scope, add reporting requirements, or attach unrelated provisions that complicate passage. By urging no further changes, the coalition is signaling that the current text represents a negotiated baseline they can defend, and that reopening the bill poses more downside than upside.

The groups did not, according to the source, publicly identify specific amendments they fear or name individual lawmakers whose positions prompted the statement.

Congressional Backdrop

The push comes as digital asset legislation has accumulated momentum on Capitol Hill, with multiple crypto-related bills moving through committee processes in recent sessions. Whether the staking and mining tax measure has the floor votes to advance as a standalone bill or would need to move as part of a broader package was not specified in the lobby groups' statement.

The industry's unified front on the "no amendments" ask is itself a signal: the lobbying coalition views the current window as one of the cleaner opportunities to lock in deferral treatment before a new legislative calendar or shifting committee dynamics complicate the path.

Related reading

About this story

Filed by the digital assets desk of MarketPR on June 23, 2026. Source: cointelegraph.com. Indicative figures are not investment advice.

←Back to the news index

Frequently asked

When would staking and mining rewards be taxed under the proposed bill?

Taxation would be deferred until the point of sale, so participants would owe tax only when they eventually sell the newly issued tokens rather than when they receive them.

Why are the lobby groups insisting the bill pass without changes?

They view the current text as a defensible negotiated baseline and believe reopening it for amendments risks narrowing its scope, adding reporting requirements, or attaching unrelated provisions that could derail passage.

How does the bill differ from current law?

Existing law could potentially be interpreted to treat the receipt of rewards as immediately taxable ordinary income, whereas the bill would defer the taxable event until the assets are sold.

Who benefits operationally from the deferral structure?

Participants who earn rewards but hold illiquid positions or lack fiat liquidity at the time of receipt would avoid a tax liability before converting any asset to cash.

Will the bill advance as a standalone measure or part of a larger package?

The article states this was not specified in the lobby groups' statement, leaving unclear whether the measure has the floor votes to pass alone or must move within a broader package.