MARKETSRussell Glen Company Breaks Ground on 42,000-Square-Foot Pediatric Center at Former Southern Dallas Macy'sJun 30MARKETSSupreme Court Blocks Trump From Firing Fed Governor Lisa Cook, Fortifying Central Bank IndependenceJun 30MARKETSCD&R Foundation Commits $4.5 Million to Five New York City Nonprofits Focused on Economic OpportunityJun 30MARKETSNano-X Imaging Faces Securities Class Action; DJS Law Group Alerts NNOX InvestorsJun 30MACROTwenty-Six Jurisdictions Sue Trump Administration Over Medicaid Work-Rule ExemptionsJun 30MACROPowassan Virus Cases Hit Record High in 2025, CDC Data Show, as Experts Warn of 15-Minute Transmission WindowJun 30MARKETSYen Slides Past ¥162 to a 40-Year Low as Federal Reserve Hawkishness Compounds the PressureJun 30CRYPTOSecuritize to Debut on NYSE Thursday After Cantor Shareholders Clear MergerJun 30MACROSupreme Court Lets Lisa Cook Stay as Fed Governor, Citing Central Bank's Unique Constitutional StatusJun 30MARKETSFed Chair Warsh Looks Less Hawkish Than Billed as Inflation Case Gets ChallengedJun 30MARKETSRussell Glen Company Breaks Ground on 42,000-Square-Foot Pediatric Center at Former Southern Dallas Macy'sJun 30MARKETSSupreme Court Blocks Trump From Firing Fed Governor Lisa Cook, Fortifying Central Bank IndependenceJun 30MARKETSCD&R Foundation Commits $4.5 Million to Five New York City Nonprofits Focused on Economic OpportunityJun 30MARKETSNano-X Imaging Faces Securities Class Action; DJS Law Group Alerts NNOX InvestorsJun 30MACROTwenty-Six Jurisdictions Sue Trump Administration Over Medicaid Work-Rule ExemptionsJun 30MACROPowassan Virus Cases Hit Record High in 2025, CDC Data Show, as Experts Warn of 15-Minute Transmission WindowJun 30MARKETSYen Slides Past ¥162 to a 40-Year Low as Federal Reserve Hawkishness Compounds the PressureJun 30CRYPTOSecuritize to Debut on NYSE Thursday After Cantor Shareholders Clear MergerJun 30MACROSupreme Court Lets Lisa Cook Stay as Fed Governor, Citing Central Bank's Unique Constitutional StatusJun 30MARKETSFed Chair Warsh Looks Less Hawkish Than Billed as Inflation Case Gets ChallengedJun 30

Nano-X Imaging Faces Securities Class Action; DJS Law Group Alerts NNOX Investors

Nano-X Imaging Ltd. (NASDAQ: NNOX) is the subject of a securities class action lawsuit alleging violations of federal securities law, the DJS Law Group announced on June 29, 2026. The Los Angeles-based firm is alerting investors to the pending suit, which charges Nano-X under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 — the statutory backbone of U.S. securities fraud claims.

By Tomas ReyesMacro DeskJune 30, 20262 min read
Share

Nano-X Imaging Ltd. (NASDAQ: NNOX) is the subject of a securities class action lawsuit alleging violations of federal securities law, the DJS Law Group announced on June 29, 2026. The Los Angeles-based firm is alerting investors to the pending suit, which charges Nano-X under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 — the statutory backbone of U.S. securities fraud claims.

The Charges Against Nano-X

Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act, together with Rule 10b-5, are the primary tools federal regulators and private plaintiffs use to pursue alleged misrepresentations or omissions that affect a company's stock price. Section 20(a) extends liability to controlling persons — typically executives — when an underlying violation by the company is established. The DJS Law Group's announcement names Nano-X Imaging directly as the defendant.

What This Means for NNOX Shareholders

Class action securities suits of this kind are filed on behalf of investors who held or traded shares during a defined period and allegedly suffered losses tied to the conduct at issue. The DJS Law Group's public notice is the firm's formal step to identify and consolidate potential plaintiffs. Shareholders in Nano-X Imaging who believe they may have been harmed are being directed to contact the firm to discuss their legal rights.

The Business Stakes for Nano-X

Nano-X Imaging, listed on the Nasdaq under the ticker NNOX, operates in the medical imaging technology space. Securities litigation of this nature carries direct commercial consequences beyond any eventual settlement or judgment: legal costs, management distraction, and the reputational friction that accompanies a public fraud allegation can weigh on a company's ability to raise capital, close partnerships, and retain customers. How Nano-X responds — and how quickly it addresses the allegations in court filings — will shape the near-term investor narrative around the stock.

The source material for this report is limited to the DJS Law Group's June 29, 2026 announcement. MarketPR will update coverage as court filings and company responses become available.

Related reading

About this story

Filed by the macro desk of MarketPR on June 30, 2026. Source: MarketPR. Indicative figures are not investment advice.

Back to the news index

Key takeaways

Frequently asked

What is Nano-X Imaging being accused of?

Nano-X Imaging is named as the defendant in a securities class action alleging violations of federal securities law under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5.

Who announced the lawsuit and when?

The DJS Law Group, a Los Angeles-based firm, announced the securities class action on June 29, 2026.

What should NNOX shareholders do?

Shareholders in Nano-X Imaging who believe they may have been harmed are being directed to contact the DJS Law Group to discuss their legal rights.

What does Section 20(a) cover?

Section 20(a) extends liability to controlling persons — typically executives — when an underlying violation by the company is established.

How could the litigation affect Nano-X's business?

Beyond any settlement or judgment, the litigation can bring legal costs, management distraction, and reputational friction that may weigh on the company's ability to raise capital, close partnerships, and retain customers.